- Student Code of Conduct
- Student Life
- Standards on Urban Police Function (Table of Contents)
- Standards on Urban Police Function (Table of Contents)
- Psychology and the Conduct of Everyday Life - CRC Press Book
However breast cancer has several complications that affected the patient's life. Aims : The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life in Breast cancer patients under chemotherapy. Setting and Design: A cross-sectional study conducted on breast cancer patients that were admitted and treated in chemotherapy ward of Namazi hospital in Shiraz city, south of Iran, between Jan and Feb Statistical Analysis: We used univariate methods.
Student Code of Conduct
A multiple regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of quality of life. Results: Mean age of patients was The results of the regression analyses showed that only grade of tumor, occupational status, menopausal status, financial difficulties and dyspnea were statistically significant in predicting patients' quality of life. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study demonstrates the strength of the relationship between clinical and sociodemographical factors and breast cancer patients' quality of life. Psychological and financial support for women experiencing breast cancer diagnosis may improve quality of life.
Primary central nervous system lymphomas PCNSLs are a rare form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma which arise within and remain confined primarily to the central nervous system CNS. Presence of lymphadenopathy, organomegaly and bone marrow study was done to exclude the possibility of secondary involvement by lymphoma. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology with Hematoxylin and Eosin and reticulin stains. The immune status was evaluated by clinical examination and human immunodeficiency virus HIV serology since The patients ranged from years of age with a median age of 42 years.
Barring one patient who was HIV positive, all the others were immunocompetent.
- Poems of a love affair;
- Where the Ice Never Melts!
- 500 Of The Best Ralph Waldo Emerson Quotes Of All Time!
- Character and the Conduct of Life: Practical Psychology for Everyman.
- Download e-book The Conduct of Life (With Active Table of Contents)!
All cases were diffuse large cell lymphomas on histopathology. There was a single case of CD 3 positive T-cell lymphoma. In the present study, PCNSLs occurred in young immunocompetent patients and majority were diffuse large B cell lymphomas. This is one of the rarer diseases in children. Aim : We reviewed our records to study the clinical features, outcome and the follow-up of this condition with evaluation of the prognostic factors. Settings and Design: Tertiary care Pediatric Surgery centre. Retrospective study. Materials and Methods : The data of all patients with diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma from January to January were reviewed.
The confirmation of the diagnosis was by biopsy from the lesion. The age, sex, family history, clinical features, response to the treatment and follow-up were studied.
Results : There were four male patients. All had bleeding per rectum as the presenting complaint. Three patients had advanced disease at presentation. All the patients had signet cell adenocarcinoma. The two patients expired and one was lost to follow-up.
Standards on Urban Police Function (Table of Contents)
One patient is alive after one year of follow up and is receiving treatment. Conclusion : Colorectal cancer in children though rare can be a reality, hence any children presenting with pain in abdomen along with doubtful history of constipation and rectal bleeding should be examined carefully with special emphasis on digital rectal examination.
Patients with hereditary retinoblastoma are at increased risk of second primary tumor, the commonest tumor being osteosarcoma. Leiomyosarcoma developing as second primary neoplasm in retinoblastoma patients is unusual and most have occurred in the field of previous radiotherapy. Although with aggressive therapy better survival can be achieved, the overall prognosis of patients developing these second neoplasms is poor. In this report we present a case of leiomyosarcoma of the maxilla as a second neoplasm in a patient with bilateral retinoblastoma which has developed outside the radiation field.
Formation of bone in cases of renal cell carcinoma is a rare finding and only a couple of case reports from Japan and one from India are mentioned in the literature. Calcification inside renal mass has been reported earlier but the prognostic implications have not been clearly elucidated. We report a case which showed heterotopic bone formation ossification inside the renal mass and was managed by radical nephrectomy. The histopathology showed clear cell renal carcinoma with multiple centers of ossification in the region of calcification suggesting bone formation.
In this case report we discuss bone morphogenetic proteins which have been implicated as a prognostic and causative factor, highlight the difficulties in distinguishing between calcification and bone formation on the basis of radiological investigations and mention the geographic implications of this rare phenomenon which has not been described earlier. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignant neoplasm of the Oral Cavity, usually affecting individuals over 50 years of age. It rarely occurs in patients who are less than 40 years old 0.
However, since it is so rare, when cases occur they are often misdiagnosed and inappropriately treated leading to delay in definitive treatment. This report describes a case of squamous cell carcinoma, involving the posterolateral border of the tongue of a year-old female patient, with no deleterious habits usually associated with oral cancer. This report focuses on the etiological factors and prognosis related to the case.
Additionally, a brief literature review regarding squamous cell carcinoma in young patients is also included. Top cited articles. Users Online Ahead of print. Current Issue. Next Issue. Previous Issue. Access to the latest issue is reserved only for the paid subscribers. Issue citations. Issue statistics.
Standards on Urban Police Function (Table of Contents)
Clinical Trials Registry - India: Redefining the conduct of clinical trials. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region: Insights from the American Society of Clinical Oncology presentations. C Desai DOI The application for readmission will be made through the Admissions Committee, which will meet in consultation with the Honor Council chairperson.
Any full-time faculty member of the College, above the rank of Adjunct, may propose amendments to any Article of the Honor Code.
Psychology and the Conduct of Everyday Life - CRC Press Book
All amendments to the Honor Code will require the approval of two-thirds of the College faculty and the Office of Academic Affairs. Skip to main content. You are here Home Academics Honor Code. At the formal commitment ceremony, The Student Government President will sign on your behalf accepting the following Pledge of Honor: As a member of the student body of Young Harris College I understand that integrity is vital to the mission of the College, which is to foster the spiritual, ethical, and intellectual growth of every student.
The Council chairperson will be selected by the Office of Academic Affairs. The chairperson must be a full-time, tenured or tenure tracked faculty member. The chairperson will serve a three year term with the following responsibilities:. The purpose of this contact is to a inform the student of Honor Code procedures, b educate the student about the potential penalties for additional violations, c to answer any questions the student might have about the procedure or particular violation.
If a student wishes to appeal, the Chairperson should direct the student to the Office of Academic Affairs. The Council chairperson is responsible for. These guidelines are found under Article 5, Section II. Proper guidelines for this are found under Article 5, Section V. The Director of the Honor Program will provide a list of current members at the start of each academic year. Members of the Jury Pool will be selected by the Council chairperson to serve on the Hearing Board and should not serve more than once until all other Honor College students have served, unless extenuating circumstances require an immediate call for a Hearing Board.
A Hearing Board will consist of the Council chairperson, at least two faculty members chosen from the Faculty Jury Pool and at least two student members chosen from the Student Jury Pool. The Council chairperson will select the members of the Hearing Board. When possible, the Council chairperson should select board members representing different Academic Divisions. The Council chairperson will preside over the Hearing Board and will vote only in case of a tie.
The Council chairperson and every selected member of the Hearing Board is required to protect the privacy of the student s involved in a hearing and to maintain the standards of the Honor Code. It is the responsibility of each member to observe the following standards:. Hearing Board members must refrain from making accusations or statements that cannot be supported;.
- The Report.
- Tables of Contents (Full Editions).
- The German Air Force, Luftwaffe and the Invasion of Normandy 1944.
A Hearing Board member approached by any person whose intent is to influence the deliberation should report the incident to the Honor Council chairperson;. During adjudication of an alleged violation, all documents and records relevant to the proceedings are kept in a confidential file in the Office of Academic Affairs and will be available to the Hearing Board members and the student in a secured environment.
For statistical purposes, the Office of Academic Affairs will maintain a recorded entry in the Honor Code database. This record will be used in the processing of anonymous reports about the efficiency of the Honor Code system and cannot be used against the student in future cases;. The recorded entry in the Honor Code database, however, will not be destroyed;.
Such reporting will be done in a way that ensures the confidentiality of the proceedings and does not reveal the identities of involved individuals. A permanent file of these reports will be maintained in the Office of Academic Affairs. In acknowledging that each case is unique to the individuals involved and may not conform neatly within the confines of these guidelines, it is understood that the Chairperson and jury pool may deviate from said guidelines within reasonable limitations to expedite the process. Any concerns regarding such deviation can be made in the form of an appeal.
Anyone accused of an Honor Code violation will be considered innocent until proven guilty. To report Honor Code Violations, the following procedures will be followed:. At that meeting the faculty member will discuss the offence with the student, presenting the student with available evidence. Then the proctor should report the incident to the course professor as soon as possible so that the proctor and the course professor can discuss the incident with the student.
If a student believes that an Honor Code violation has been committed, the student will inform the course professor. The faculty member will then follow the above procedures for reporting Honor Violations by faculty. If after meeting with the student the faculty member determines that the Honor Code was not violated, the charge will be dismissed and faculty member will make no permanent record of the meeting. If after meeting with the student the faculty member determines that the Honor Code was violated and the faculty member wishes to assign sanctions, the faculty member may adjudicate the charge by choosing one of the following options:.
This may not involve having the student re-do the work in question without academic penalty. If the faculty member imposes any sanction, and if the student agrees with the charge and sanction, the faculty member will complete an Honor Code Violation Report. The student and faculty member will sign the report. Confidential copies will be given to the student, the faculty member, and the Vice President of Academic Affairs. If the faculty member chooses to present the alleged violation to the Division Dean rather than adjudicate the matter. The following procedure will be used.
At that meeting, the Division Dean will be in charge. The faculty member will present the evidence. The student has the opportunity to refute the charge or contest the penalty. The Division Dean, in consultation with the faculty member, may adjudicate the charge by choosing one of the following options:. If the charge is dismissed, the Division Dean and faculty member will make no permanent record of the meeting;. If the Division Dean and faculty member impose any sanction, and if the student agrees to the charge and the sanction, the Division Dean will update and sign the Honor Code Violation Report.
Confidential copies will be given to the student, the faculty member, and the Office of Academic Affairs. If this occurs, a Hearing Board will meet, following the procedures outlined below:. The student will receive a written notice specifying the alleged violation of the Honor Code, the time and place of the hearing, and the procedures that will be used during the hearing. Upon receipt of the hearing notice, the student will have the right to access and review physical evidence used to support the alleged violation.
The student has the right to be present during the hearing while evidence is being presented and may remain until the Board begins deliberations. The student may choose to remain silent during the hearing, and such silence will not be taken as an admission of guilt. The student may also elect not to appear at the hearing; failure to appear will not be taken as an admission of guilt. The student may bring to the hearing an individual from within the College community whose role is to serve as an advisor.
Such person may not act in a legal capacity, and may speak only when invited to do so by the chairperson. The chairperson will explain the exact nature of the violation of the Honor Code. If it is subsequently determined that this explanation was incomplete or inaccurate, the chairperson will promptly inform all parties of this fact in writing.
The Board will first hear from the complainant,--the person making the charge-- who may choose to make a statement, after which the Board may question the complainant.